February 2007
More CDIC deposit protection needed for registered retirement investments
E-mail Petition Letter and Submission Form




To add your name to our campaign, please fill out the form below and click the Send Message button. You will receive a confirmation email in your inbox soon afterwards - simply click the link in the message after verifying the contact info you have entered, and we will send a copy of the letter below (verbatim) to Mr. Flaherty's email address, formatted with your contact information.

Dear Minister Flaherty,

The Government needs to recognize that all guaranteed registered retirement investment products, whether they be RRSPs, RRIF, or LIFs, held at member financial institutions of the Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation (CDIC), should carry 100% deposit insurance protection.

CDIC coverage protects retirement deposits to a maximum of $100,000 per individual, per institution. Yet, by contrast, as many as half of provincial deposit insurance schemes across Canada insure retirement accounts to 100% of their accumulating value.

CDIC-insured deposits in retirement accounts are regarded by income-dependent seniors as safe havens for their savings. However, the range of types of institutions, or of locations of issuer, which should not effect retirement income, does indeed have an effect. That variability poses the peril of under-insurance and under protection for a good number of retirement accounts.

Do we need to revive a fading memory - the memory of debacles of some financial institutions in the 1980s?

As you're aware, the cost of additional coverage is not an expense of government - it's an operational cost borne by the financial institution. Moreover, like any CDIC expense, it is ultimately included in the price of the financial product purchased - therefore at my cost.

Your full name:

Your e-mail address:


Your home address:
Street Address
City
Prov
Post Code
For this letter to be vaild, correct information is required