
| Glossary of Financial Terms | | |
The Companion Advisor:
General Interest
Myths and misconceptions in Family
Law
By Megan Pallett, Lawyer
1.
Living together is "the same as" being married.
In certain situations, living together is "the same as" being
married. For instance, the Canada Pension Plan recognizes common-law spouses,
as do many private pension and benefit plans. As well, a common-law spouse
can claim support from his or her spouse if their relationship ends, as
long as the couple had lived together for three years. The couple must
have lived together for 1 year to be considered "spouses" for
the purpose of the Income Tax Act.
There is, however, one very significant right which common-law spouses
do not have. That is the right to obtain an equal division of property
on the termination of the couple's relationship. As many people are aware,
with a few exceptions, a married couple must share equally the value of
all property they acquired during their marriage. A common-law spouse
does not have this automatic entitlement to an "equalization payment".
In certain cases, if the common-law spouse sacrificed his or her time
raising the couple's children, or helped to build up the assets of the
other spouse, a claim could be made for compensation for this sacrifice
or contribution.
2. If my daughter inherits my estate, her husband
could get half of it if their marriage failed.
Inheritances are one of the few assets which are not subject to being
"divided" on marriage breakdown. If the daughter had all or
part of the inheritance left when she and her husband separated, her husband
could not make a claim to it. The exception to this rule would be where
the daughter used the inheritance to buy a family home or cottage, or
to pay down the mortgage on the family home or cottage. Neither should
the daughter put part of the inheritance into a joint account with her
husband. In those cases, the special status of the inheritance would be
lost and the value of the house or cottage would be shared equally with
the husband, regardless of the fact that much of the value was obtained
through the inheritance.
3. I cannot get a divorce until everything to do
with property, support and the children has been finalized.
Resolving all of the issues surrounding a separation can, at times be
a long process. Even if these other claims are unresolved, a divorce can
still be obtained after one year from the date of separation.
4. These days, no one should get married without
a Marriage Contract.
A Marriage Contract can be drafted to completely change the rights or
obligations a husband or wife would otherwise have on marriage termination.
A Marriage Contract is not necessary or helpful for every couple. Many
couples, particularly those starting out with little property, would agree
that everything either of them acquire during their marriage should be
the property of both. Some situations where a Marriage Contract would
be advisable are the following: (a) The couple is entering into a second
marriage and one or both of the spouses wish to have Wills drawn up, leaving
most of their property to someone other than their future husband or wife,
such as to their own children from prior marriages. (b) One spouse owns
a home or cottage in which the couple will be residing together. (c) One
spouse has, or will have, significantly greater assets than the other
spouse. A marriage contract can be particularly important if the value
of the assets are anticipated to increase significantly after the marriage
or if the asset is a business.
5. The Courts will "punish" the spouse who leaves the marriage
or commits adultery by awarding less property or support, or by denying
custody of the children.
Prior to 1978, it was very important to determine who was "at fault"
for the breakdown of a marriage, and a finding of fault could negatively
affect all of the above claims. This is no longer the case under current
Ontario law. Whether fair or not, the conduct of a spouse during the marriage
will not affect his or her entitlement or rights.
6. If my business partner and her husband separate,
he will become the owner of one-quarter of our business.
A separating spouse has the right to claim one-half of the net value of
all of the property the other spouse acquired over the marriage. The spouse
making the claim must, of course, account for the value of the property
he or she acquired over the marriage as well, so that their properties
can be "equalized".
The business partner here will have to account to her husband for the
value of her interest in the business. The husband does not actually acquire
half or any of the wife's interest in the business. His rights are limited
to ascertaining the value and requiring his wife to make the resulting
"equalization" payment. As long as the wife is able to fund
this payment from other sources, the business should not be affected.
Difficulties could arise, however, if no other assets were available to
satisfy the husband's equalization claim. In most cases, the separation
of the business partner from his/her spouse would not directly affect
the business or the ownership of the business.
In some cases, it might be advisable for business partners to seek further
advice. These include situations where:
1. the spouse has
been a shareholder, officer or director;
2. the spouse has been directly involved in the running of the
business, even if this occurred years ago;
3. the spouse has contributed financially to the business, including
providing guarantees on business loans or pledging the family home as
security; or
4. the business interest is the only, or the most substantial asset
belonging to either of the partner and his or her spouse. It should also
be stressed that if one partner's marriage is terminated not by separation,
but by the death of the partner, other considerations do apply and some
early planning in this regard is advisable.
The information in this article is general and
should not be relied upon as a substitute for professional advice in specific
situations.
©1996 - For more information contact Megan Pallett, a lawyer practicing
in association with the Mississauga, Ontario law firm of Pallett Valo, Barristers
and Solicitors, working with clients in the area of family law. Phone 905-273-3300
or 1-800-323-3781 Fax 905-273-6920
* * *
|
|
Use this link to load a printer-friendly
version of this document. |

Have a question regarding this article? Use our feedback form to send us a note.
© , Fiscal Agents Money Management Newsletter
25 Lakeshore Road, Oakville, On L6K 1C6.
(905) 844-7700
|
|
|